The Civil War Bullet  

Go Back   The Civil War Bullet > Civil War Era Relics and Collectibles > Bullets and Cartridges

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 09:38 PM
Established Users
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Default M&M 176 versus 173

I recently purchased a bullet and it appears to be a 173. The seller insists it is a 176 variant. How can I tell the difference? Would it be ok to put a pic up?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-04-2009, 01:33 PM
Established Users
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 442
Default

First... it's okay to post photos of the bullet in question. Just make sure the photos are not too large (filesize), because this forum has a limit on photo-size.

Second... good clear well-focused closup photos are the only way we can see what we need to see in order to answer your question.

Regards,
Pete [P.C. George]
__________________
"Caution-note: People's interpretations of the Evidence may vary."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 12:23 PM
Established Users
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Default

Here are the pictures. I tried to get two good side shots and a base shot. I also have them aligned next to the 173 in the M&M book and next to the 176. The seller called it a 176v but I don't see it. Maybe someone can enlighten me as to why it is a 176v (if it is). The seller copped a bit of an attitude when I asked him to explain to me why it wasn't a 173. Thanks!





Last edited by Abaddon; 11-07-2009 at 12:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 12:27 PM
Established Users
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Default

Well it'll only let me post 4 pic links per post so here it is next to the 176:

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 03:25 PM
Established Users
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 442
Default

Thank you for providing the clear well-focused focus I requested. They enable me to give you the info you want.

I should have also asked you to provide precise meaurement of the minie's diameter ...which is extremely necessary for correct identification. (That is why all the civil war bullet refence-books give the projectile's precise diameter, in addition to the caliber of the firearm it was intended to be used in.)

M&M176 is what bullet collectors call a One-Groove Gardner. Because it is quite rare in comparison to the quantity of "typical" Gardner minies, its dollar-value is 10 times higher. Serious bullet Collectors are very dismayed that some bullet sellers are claiming that ANY Gardner which kinda-sorta resembles M&M176 is a high-value "variant" of M&M176. ("Variant" is what the letter v at the end of M&M176v means.)

A "typical" Gardner minie has two flat-bottomed grooves which are separated by a smooth band that is the same diameter as the bullet. The most important distinguishing characteristic of the M&M176 minie is the fact that the two grooves DISTINCTLY merge into a single "valley," ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BULLET.

Your photos show that this minie is absolutely definitely NOT a M&M176 -- nor is it a M&M176v...for two reasons.
1- The photos show that the minie's two grooves crowd together at only one portion of the minie's circumference -- the grooves are clearly quite separate from each other around the rest of the minie's body.
2- Both the shape of the minie's nose AND the length of its smooth-sided base area are significantly different from those areas of M&M176. Therefore, "at best" it could be called a variant of some other .577 or .58-caliber Gardner (possibly the M&M175 which you suggested).

To serious collectors and students of civil war bullets, the claim that this minie is a variant of M&M176 is "wishful thinking." That opinion is amplified by your report that "The seller copped a bit of an attitude when I asked him to explain to me why it wasn't a 173."

To my eye, this minie has a fired look to it. If possible, please provide the precise diameter measurement of the minie. For clarification: "Precise" means taken with calipers (like the minies in the book are), which produces a measurement in thousandths-of-an-inch, such as .571-inch.

Regards,
Pete [P.C. George]
__________________
"Caution-note: People's interpretations of the Evidence may vary."

Last edited by PCGeorge; 11-07-2009 at 07:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 08:58 PM
Established Users
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PCGeorge View Post
Thank you for providing the clear well-focused focus I requested. They enable me to give you the info you want.

I should have also asked you to provide precise meaurement of the minie's diameter ...which is extremely necessary for correct identification. (That is why all the civil war bullet refence-books give the projectile's precise diameter, in addition to the caliber of the firearm it was intended to be used in.)

M&M176 is what bullet collectors call a One-Groove Gardner. Because it is quite rare in comparison to the quantity of "typical" Gardner minies, its dollar-value is 10 times higher. Serious bullet Collectors are very dismayed that some bullet sellers are claiming that ANY Gardner which kinda-sorta resembles M&M176 is a high-value "variant" of M&M176. ("Variant" is what the letter v at the end of M&M176v means.)

A "typical" Gardner minie has two flat-bottomed grooves which are separated by a smooth band that is the same diameter as the bullet. The most important distinguishing characteristic of the M&M176 minie is the fact that the two grooves DISTINCTLY merge into a single "valley," ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BULLET.

Your photos show that this minie is absolutely definitely NOT a M&M176 -- nor is it a M&M176v...for two reasons.
1- The photos show that the minie's two grooves crowd together at only one portion of the minie's circumference -- the grooves are clearly quite separate from each other around the rest of the minie's body.
2- Both the shape of the minie's nose AND the length of its smooth-sided base area are significantly different from those areas of M&M176. Therefore, "at best" it could be called a variant of some other .577 or .58-caliber Gardner (possibly the M&M175 which you suggested).

To serious collectors and students of civil war bullets, the claim that this minie is a variant of M&M176 is "wishful thinking." That opinion is amplified by your report that "The seller copped a bit of an attitude when I asked him to explain to me why it wasn't a 173."

To my eye, this minie has a fired look to it. If possible, please provide the precise diameter measurement of the minie. For clarification: "Precise" means taken with calipers (like the minies in the book are), which produces a measurement in thousandths-of-an-inch, such as .571-inch.

Regards,
Pete [P.C. George]
I wondered as much. What's the best way to size a bullet? I've seen pictures of a gauge that people use and I'd like to pick one up (if that's the best way). Thanks for the help!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2009, 10:44 PM
Established Users
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16
Default

You can get good dial calipers relatively cheaply (usually under 30$) at reloading supply places (Midway, Natchez, Midsouth) and large tool supply houses (Harbor Freight,etc).
These tools have an easy to read dial that will read to 4 places, i.e. .5876
Often the dial calipers are made of plastic, but they hold up well for years. That should be all you need for measuring bullet diameters.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0