30 Years War Weapons

Battlefield 1866

Established Users
Here is a little information on the 30 Years War and weapons.

The 30 Years War (1618-1648) started as a religious war, the Catholics against Protestant reformation. As the war dragged on it became a struggle for power and wealth, during this war about 1 in 3 towns in Germany was destroyed and about the same number in population killed. It was extremely violent and spread throughout the continent involving just about every European country.

The two camps: Catholics on one side and the Protestants in the other. In Germany most of the western part of Germany was Protestant and had Swedish allies helping them. The Imperialist or Catholics were in the other, armies from Italy, Spain and eastern Europe made up this group.

The weapons were virtually the same for both armies. The primary instrument on the battlefield was the Musketeer who was armed with a matchlock rifle. The matchlock was also known as the Arqebus and the soldiers that carried them Arqebusier or Musketeer. The caliber of these weapons varied greatly. The Musketeer carried a matchlock rifle, a rifle rest (forked pole), a bandoleer which held pre-measured powder, a priming flask, a rapier (narrow blade sword), and sometimes a dagger or side knife. He could have a helmet made of iron and also a breast plate or cuirass.

The next figure on the battlefield was the Pikeman, he carried a very long spear designed to dismount cavalry, plow paths through infantry squares, and to provide a very intimidating sight to the opponents as they marched forward in square with pikes raised. They would be equipped about the same as the Musketeer minus the matchlock.

Next would be the mounted troops which could also be armored and carried a variety of weapons ranging from any combination of sword, spear, matchlock rifle or pistol, wheel lock pistol and so on.

Some troops were stilled armed with crossbows, especially troops from Croatia as in the 1634 battle at Noerdlingen. Cross bow bolt finds there support this.

The King of Battle.....The artillery. Swedish King and General Gustavus Aldolphus revolutionized the way artillery was employed during the 30 years war. He reduced the size of the field artillery and even constructed light guns with leather barrels! Typical Swedish field guns were 3, 4, 6, and 12 pounder. Of course, in these times it was very hard to standardize anything and many cannon had to have ammunition specially created for it’s own unique bore diameter. There were siege and garrison pieces, which could be very large, also big stone throwers and bombards, which would fire explosive shells (cannon balls). For the most part field guns fired solid iron shot and canister, the canister could be iron balls, lead balls, or square – cubed iron shot.

Please see attached scans of Musketeers, Matchlocks, Wheel locks, Musket accessories, Pikeman, and a nice shot of the Coburg armory, which has a display of equipment to outfit about 100 musketeers.

One additional note: Matchlock gun parts and other finds from this period have been made in the US! The excavations at Santa Elena SC, a Spanish colonial fort. Matchlock gun parts, crossbow bolts, pieces of armor, bullet molds, musket balls, rapier parts, and other finds from the Spanish settlements there. As well should be mentioned the numerous Spanish ship wrecks from the 16th century off the southern US coast.

Keep the questions coming!


Brad
 
30 Years War Armory

Here is the picture missing from my last post of the 30 Years War Armory in Coburg.

Brad
 

Attachments

  • armory.001.jpg
    armory.001.jpg
    81.3 KB · Views: 3,520
30 Years War

Brad,

Now that I finally stopped drooling over the armory photo, I have a couple of questions.

Can you give an approximate caliber range for the longarms used?

I thought that the matchlock and wheelock ignitions were on smoothbore weapons, were they rifled? Patched ball projectiles?

Are there any illustrations of the leather cannon? I'm intrigued.

Thanks for the info,
TomH
 
Take a look at some of the other posts I put up last night. There are some pis of some dug relics and musket balls.

I guess when I said matchlock rifle I should have left the "rifle" part out. They were all smooth bore. I would say the average caliber or bore diameter for the Long arms was between .60 and .70 inch. There are musket balls found in just about every size you can think of on the battlefield. To my knowledge there was not a standard caliber, I am sure some armies tried to keep weapons with about the same bore diameter to make ammunition supply easier. But, with the number of round ball molds found on the battlefield as well as other 30 Years War sites I guess that just about everyone had his own mold and made bullets himself. The mold sizes are all different.

I will pull out my books later toady and scan a leather cannon for you.

Brad
 
Calibers

Brad,

I did look at your other posts right after I asked the questions, doh!

Who were the major manufacturers for military matchlocks and wheellocks? I know that a "stand" of most european rifle muskets included a mold, do you know if that was the same for the earlier weapons?

Thanks,
TomH
 
I really do not the answer to that one. I do know that in Germany weapons were made in many places during this time. There was not a central arsenal or armory. Each of the bigger towns would have its own armory. For example in the town I live the old arsenal is still standing although now it is the local news paper office. Also the "Shot Tower" is still standing. This is were melted lead was poured from inside the top of the tower, by the time the lead hit the bottom it had cooled into round shot - round balls.

Wheel locks were, and still are, very complicated and it took skilled gunsmiths to make them and repair them.

I guess I need to hit the museums again, I do have a good book from the Coburg arsenal - that is where these scans came from and the picture of all the match locks. I will look in the book again and see if it tells anything about where some of these were made.

Again, out of about 8 matchlock lock plates I have found on the battlefield no two are alike. Same goes for the trigger levers, trigger guards and so on. I think there was great diversity and little standardization.

Brad
 
Matchlocks

Brad,

I probably should have worded my question differently. I was actually wondering if the "arsenal" system was in place at the time or if the weapons were actually made by several small groups of craftsmen. I have a collection of Belgian pistols (circa 1840's) and from what I have read, they were actually produced by a group of families in Liege, each family responsible for a different part of the final assembly. I was wondering if the military weapons of the period were produced the same way or if there was more of a standardized method.

BTW: There are still a few shot towers remaining here in the states.

Thanks again,
TomH
 
TomH,

Well, I am waiting on a book I just ordered on the weapon production at Liege (Luettich) Belgium. I really need to stop by there next time I go through, I have heard they have a great museum.

I am really do not know that much about weapon production since I collect only dug relics. However, you had some good questions and I will get to work and see what I can find out. I imagine there were centers for arms production in each country. I only know of the more modern (19th century). As with everything else, weapon production was watched closely and when someone made a new development they all picked it up quickly. When it comes to my battlefield dug pieces, unless you can find some sort of a makers mark or stamp, it will be almost impossible to find out more about it. Another funny observation, I have actual pieces dug from the battlefield, well in a lot of the museum, armories etc. you really do not find anything quit like what was dug.

In Europe a lot of arms copies were made 100+ years ago. In respectable auction houses they sell these as a "historical reproduction" however there are those who sell them as original Halberd, Pike, matchlock, medieval broad sword etc. In some of the collections you can see in the museums I am sure some of these pieces are these "historical reproductions" Still an antique, but rather 200 years old vs. 400 and so on.

That is why I really like the dug stuff with provenance, especially if I dug it myself. I think, as with what was learned by US CW diggers.....there is more knowledge in the ground sometimes than in the books.

I still owe the picture of the leather cannon and whatever I can find out about the matchlocks in the Coburg collection.

Brad
 
Back
Top